Euny viene ingaggiata come governante e bambinaia nella casa di una ricchissima famiglia, dove la giovane e bella moglie di un uomo d'affari aspetta il frutto della seconda gravidanza, due gemelli. Bambina a sua volta, per lo spirito ingenuo e generoso che la contraddistingue, Euny conquista tutti, dalla piccola Nami, la primogenita, alla collega anziana che ha speso la sua vita a servizio nella villa, al padrone di casa, che presto passa a chiederle ben piĂč di quello che Ăš stata chiamata a fare. Quando la ragazza si ritrova incinta, la padroncina e sua madre non esitano a pianificare il peggio, in nome dei privilegi da conservare, costi quel che costi.
G**A
Keep up the good work I appreciated it thank you
Keep up the good work I appreciated it thank you
J**E
Edgy domestic thriller
Edgy domestic thriller. Carries you along. I couldn't predict what would happen and enjoyed the tense expectation. I liked it a lot.
D**G
....and so by fire..
A girl from a poor background takes a job at the mansion of a rich man. Her duties are to look after the man's pregnant-with-twins wife. In the household are the housekeeper and the child, Nami. The man turns to the housekeeper when he can't have sex with his wife and she seems to fall for him and becomes pregnant. This is the start of a very nasty set of situations.The housekeeper knows that the housemaid and the man have had sex and she passes it on to the wife and her mother. Between them all, they conspire to take the baby away from her in various ways, the most spectacular being a fall from a chandelier engineered by the grandmother and seen by Nami. They put the housemaid through hell; the man is left out of the picture completely. Apparently,it was a game of honour in that the wife and her mother refuse to acknowledge a child born on the wrong side of the blanket.Although the housemaid plots her revenge, this where the plot loses something. The scene was set for a final settling of accounts but it did not turn out that way ; in fact,the final scenes made no sense at all plotwise or in their motivation. However,this may be a misreading of the film's final agonies but the ending was disappointing. This was a great shame because the film was otherwise great in character development and the depiction of the large rambling mansion peopled by a culturally bigoted family was excellent.
M**I
No English subtitles - that says it all
No English subtitles which is very disappointing to say the least. Should have highlighted this fact on the product page (especially since it's on Amazon UK). I have been trying to return the item but Amazon UK does not have a return address label, only a QR code which is not acceptable to UPS here in Singapore. I wish Amazon UK would make it possible for overseas customers to return purchases.
N**K
pointless and empty, nothing close to a movie like parasite
Gets two stars for cinematography and acting only. The plot is garbage because the maid is dumb and the ârevengeâ she concocts is so pointless and ultimately inconsequential that youâll wonder what the movie was about and why you wasted your time. This movie should have been about class and socio- economic struggles; like the movie parasite. Instead it seems to be more about women being catty and scheming against the maid. And the problem is that the scheming doesnât have to be clever because the targeted maid is so naive and dumb that the wealthy women will get away with their wrong doings no matter what. A housemaid interfering with the life of a wealthy family is a great concept for a movie; but it is wasted with this pretentious, unsatisfying and pointless nothing of a film.
T**C
can you Guess Which Ones?
I'll try to review this without spoilers.packaging, condition, delivery whole transaction hassle free.I quite like subtitles - I find they focus attention. Although I have to admit I often wonder how accurately they convey the moment.It's only my opinion but I generally find that Cinema outside the USA and UK has a different feel. A more examining attitude. Even their 'frothy' light-hearted offerings have a less glitzy and more 'judge me' feel.This was not light hearted. It's a blunt view on a slice of life. Contemporarily set its the story set over about a year. the lead lady is a young woman living her mum and their daily grind of working at fast food stall. A significant event is witnessed and the young girl wanting more from life - or at least a different life - goes to work as a maid for VERY wealthy family. Here we are introduced to the Father, a successful business man who has everything. There is the beautiful, heavily pregnant wife, and the adorable, hones, although not spoilt child, the aged lady who runs the house the house and has been with them forever, and finally there is the wife's mother.what follows is a fairly good examination of human motives and failings. I liked this.I also thought I knew from early on where it was al going but I was wrong, I did however realise how it would end, but the intriguing thing was how was it going to get to that point?I also like the fact that every one is not all good or bad - the days of the white hats and the black hats seem so old as to make me question if they ever really existed.I also liked one part where one of the characters spoke and behaved in a manner so as to make me re-assess where the story was going BUT only at the end did I realise that they were not being altruistic but merely self absorbed.Having said that I like not all good not all bad I do not like it when directors or story tellers tell us contradictory plot points and do not give upthe background as to why. If they don't then it just makes the story pointless. An example would be a who dunnit where the big reveal is not one of the cast of characters/suspects you've been analysing for 2 hrs but a random killer never before alluded to.I found a bit of this with the aged governess. I really wanted to know more about why she was as conflicted as she was.Trying no to be patronising with this, and I realise that I'm no position to preach, because I perhaps don't know enough about eastern cultures to know that the Aged Governess acted perfectly in keeping with what would be expected, but (now for the patronising bit) I suspect that to get the most out of this film you have to have some inkling of the eastern culture and how very different from the western culture it is (or at least was) especially in terms of honour and respect. Perhaps we had it here once but then again I'm not so sure the past we are shown ever really existed like it was supposed to. Perhaps it was very like now but with different clothes, different speech, less labour saving devices and less awareness of the broader world.To sum up I thought all the character were good - I found them all well done. I particularly like the lead characters mum. I thought she was perfectly captured - the world weariness and wariness was right but not clichéd or over done.PERHAPS A BIT OF SPOILER HERE - what I say now will not tell you exactly what happened but might give you hint but I feel I must say it as it gives another reason to watch this film.The ending left me very thoughtful, sad, angry and reassured. Quite brew.to expand a little - not too much - It made me think about society, I felt for 3 and a half of the characters ( can you guess which ones?), It made me angry because of the inequity/injustice and the reassurance I got was 'yeah that about sums up the way of the world'.As for the nudity it's minimal and not overly explicit. and the language/subtitles have occasional moments, but in the main it's the story. It really does hook you.After all this a story the Americans churn out at a staggering rate starring some moderately successful tv soap actress for weekday afternoons - in other words god awful clichéd pap. The difference here is there is a realism.ACID TEST: would I buy it again/recommend it - YES
P**R
Like a modern palace intrigue...
The plot of the film has been summarized in other reviews.However, the cataclysmic import of the housemaid's suicide has been lost toreviewers with Western cultural sensibilities.In East Asian cultures, "losing face" is very, very important.Suicide is the highest and most honorable form of protest.So, the rich family was deeply humiliated by the housemaid's suicide, in front of them.This tragic ending is presaged in the excellent first scene of the movie, when amidstthe indifferent bustling crowds of the city, an unknown young woman commits suicide.In the supremely ironic final scene, the rich celebrate, unperturbed, their young daughter's birthday.The whole film strongly resembles the excellent historical dramas of contemporary Korean cinema:The unbelievable refinement and opulence of the daily existence in the labyrinthine mansion,the abject submission and reverence of the servants to the master of the house and the members of his family,and the panic of the rich wife and her mother, over the possibility of an illegitimate heir to their "kingdom".
J**.
Asian classic still shocking till this day
A tale about social class and power abuse, still relevant to this day. What makes it a classic is the story doesn't deal with the theme in a sentimental or idealized way: it shows in a credible way the manipulation from both sides in a servant-master relationship.
C**M
GREAT foreign film!
This was an awesome foreign movie. I LOVED IT. It's not especially "scary", more of an arthouse psychological/ sensual thriller. Film likely adapted from a theater piece. So good. 5 stars.
L**D
Im Sang-soo en deux films : le parasitisme bon chic mauvais genre
Im Sang-soo sâest fait connaĂźtre avec trois films tous trois (trĂšs) estimables : Une Femme corĂ©enne (2003), The Presidentâs Last Bang (2005) et Le vieux jardin (2007). Les amateurs du cinĂ©ma corĂ©en les apprĂ©ciaient, les critiques aussi dans lâensemble. Cela sâest un peu gĂątĂ© avec son remake de La Servante de Kim Ki-young (1960) â sorti sous le titre anglais The Housemaid (2010) â et plus encore avec LâIvresse de lâargent (2012). Ces deux films sont cousins : les turpitudes de la grande bourgeoisie y sont Ă©talĂ©es avec une gourmandise non dissimulĂ©e, jusquâĂ la caricature.Im Sang-soo assure quâil nâaime pas beaucoup le film de Kim Ki-Young (disponible en dvd et blu-ray chez Carlotta). Il faut avoir du cran, non seulement parce que comme pour tout remake on sâexpose Ă ĂȘtre Ă©valuĂ© en fonction de lâĆuvre originale, mais aussi et surtout parce que La Servante a un statut Ă part dans le cinĂ©ma corĂ©en. Il y a peu de films isolĂ©s qui aient dans une cinĂ©matographie nationale une place aussi centrale. Si lâon a vu Ă la fois La Servante et le rĂ©cent mĂ©ga-succĂšs de Bong Joon-ho Parasite, on voit bien ce que le deuxiĂšme doit au premier. Il va de soi, pour se cantonner Ă des Ćuvres des derniĂšres annĂ©es, que le Mademoiselle de Park Chan-wook lui doit aussi beaucoup, etc. Si le cĂŽtĂ© mĂ©lodrame exacerbĂ© du film aura fait florĂšs dans le cinĂ©ma corĂ©en ultĂ©rieur, son audace en matiĂšre de jeu de massacre et dâexamen des perversions au sein de lâunitĂ© familiale aura de toute Ă©vidence Ă©tĂ© pour beaucoup de cinĂ©astes corĂ©ens un modĂšle. Bong Joon-ho reconnaĂźt quâen Ă©crivant Parasite il Ă©tait conscient des influences diverses, Ă commencer par celle de Kim Ki-young. Sans doute sensible au fait que le film a vieilli par certains cĂŽtĂ©s, Bong Joon-ho a eu lâintelligence de ne pas refaire une adaptation plus ou moins cachĂ©e de La Servante, et si lui aussi examine les rapports de classe dans son pays, il le fait en dĂ©finitive trĂšs diffĂ©remment. Câest sans doute une des supĂ©rioritĂ©s de Parasite sur The Housemaid, qui ne fait que mettre au goĂ»t du jour une histoire au potentiel de subversion un peu Ă©ventĂ© avec les dĂ©cennies.Cela dit, mĂȘme un peu Ă©ventĂ©, le parfum de scandale de The Housemaid reste plaisant Ă respirer. Cela est tout dâabord dĂ» Ă lâart de la caricature, maĂźtrisĂ© par nombre de cinĂ©astes corĂ©ens, qui savent faire passer des traits tracĂ©s au crayon parfois un peu gras. On a droit Ă la totale, en terme de signaux culturels envoyĂ©s relativement Ă cette famille : le pĂšre joue son Beethoven le matin avant dâaller travailler, et le soir la famille au grand complet Ă©coute religieusement Maria Callas ; un grand cru est systĂ©matiquement dĂ©bouchĂ©, pour se dĂ©lasser, ou sĂ©duire, etc. Tout cela est âtoo muchâ sans doute, mais aprĂšs tout le âtoo muchâ nâest pas dĂ©placĂ© lorsquâil est question de montrer une monstruositĂ© qui ne sâavoue jamais quâelle en est une, la cachant sous des atours plaisants ou chics.Car chics, les films dâIm Sang-soo le sont. Ils aiment contempler une surface lisse et sans guĂšre dâautres aspĂ©ritĂ©s que celles que lâirruption dâun corps Ă©tranger suscite. A grand renfort de mouvements dâappareil, le cinĂ©aste exploite les lieux avec un goĂ»t non dissimulĂ© pour les surfaces et les volumes de ses intĂ©rieurs archi-aseptisĂ©s, dans lesquels les manifestations de la vie semblent quelque peu dĂ©placĂ©es. On a pu reprocher au cinĂ©aste son exploitation immodĂ©rĂ©e des dĂ©cors, comme sâil y inscrivait les personnages sans ressentir beaucoup dâintĂ©rĂȘt pour eux. Ce nâest sans doute pas faux, et il faut tout le talent dâacteurs plus ou moins chevronnĂ©s pour savoir donner de lâĂ©paisseur Ă des personnages qui pourraient rester jusquâau bout de pures caricatures. SI Jeon Do-yeon a dans ce film le rĂŽle le plus Ă©toffĂ© Ă dĂ©fendre, elle nâest sans doute pas complĂštement idĂ©ale. Reconnaissant bien volontiers quâelle ne comprenait guĂšre le personnage, nâĂ©pousant que trĂšs modĂ©rĂ©ment la vision volontiers Ă gros traits de son metteur en scĂšne, elle cherche Ă confĂ©rer une vĂ©racitĂ© psychologique aux choix et actions du personnage, ne ramant ainsi de toute Ă©vidence pas tout Ă fait dans le mĂȘme sens que le cinĂ©aste. Alors que du combat entre lâactrice et le cinĂ©aste il est sorti quelque chose de magnifique dans Secret Sunshine â Lee Chang-dong lâayant apparemment mise encore plus Ă rude Ă©preuve que Im Sang-soo â ici on sent bien que quelque chose ne prend pas complĂštement. Cela dit, ce nâest pas comme si cette actrice ne convenait pas au rĂŽle, câest juste quâon la sent plus Ă lâaise dans certaines scĂšnes que dans dâautres. Si les autres acteurs sâacquittent de leur tĂąche avec les honneurs, il faut bien distinguer les deux actrices les plus ĂągĂ©es, celles qui interprĂštent respectivement la vieille bonne et la mĂšre de la maĂźtresse de maison : câest souvent grĂące Ă elles deux que le film sâavĂšre tour Ă tour dĂ©lectable et lestĂ© dâune certaine mĂ©lancolie. Dans le rĂŽle de la bonne, on retrouve une actrice du cinĂ©ma corĂ©en qui avait jouĂ© dans sa prime jeunesse dans un film de Kim Ki-young, assurant ici le passage de relais avec grand talent. Câest Ă©videmment une excellente idĂ©e que de lâavoir ensuite choisie pour interprĂ©ter la mater familias surpuissante de LâIvresse de lâargent : elle y excelle tout autant que dans The Housemaid.Bref, dans The Housemaid, et plus encore dans LâIvresse de lâargent, Im Sang-soo allie bon chic et mauvais genre. Son catalogue de perversions, encore plus dĂ©veloppĂ© dans LâIvresse de lâargent, les outrances caricaturales assumĂ©es (mĂȘme sâil ne recherche pas le trash), tout cela rend ces films relativement jouissifs, Ă dĂ©faut dâĂȘtre complĂštement rĂ©ussis. MĂȘme sâil a remportĂ© beaucoup de suffrages, certains spectateurs ont trouvĂ© Parasite trop pervers et un peu vain. Câest ce quâon a reprochĂ©, sans doute un peu plus Ă juste titre, Ă ces deux films dâIm Sang-soo (ainsi quâau Mademoiselle de Park Chan-wook). Outre que la pertinence de la façon dont sont examinĂ©s les rapports de classe est sans doute plus grande chez Bong Joon-ho, il est Ă©vident quâen dĂ©finitive les deux films dâIm Sang-soo tiennent du jeu de massacre avant tout, le commentaire socio-politique ne sâavĂ©rant pas dâune acuitĂ© considĂ©rable. Il reste que ces deux films ne riment pas Ă rien ; sâils ne tiennent pas de discours articulĂ©, si les Ă©lĂ©ments de critique sociale ne sont pas dâune finesse infinie, ils nâen existent pas moins pour autant. On a pas mal dit que LâIvresse de lâargent Ă©tait un peu plus vain encore par certains cĂŽtĂ©s que The Housemaid ; il est Ă©vident que ce nâest sans aucun doute pas un film dâune grande subtilitĂ©, mais il rĂ©jouit souvent, ce qui ma foi nâest pas si malvenu par les temps qui courent.Depuis ces deux films, la carriĂšre d'Im Sang-soo semble avoir bien ralenti. Je ne sais pas Ă quoi cela est dĂ», mais quelles que soient les limites de son talent, il en a, et il est dommage qu'il ne continue pas, dans cette direction ou dans une autre.EDITIONS DVD ET BLU-RAY WILD SIDE DE âTHE HOUSEMAIDâ / EDITION DVD DE âLâIVRESSE DE LâARGENTâJâai vu dâabord lâĂ©dition dvd britannique de The Housemaid (Axiom Films), puis lâĂ©dition blu-ray française (Wild Side). Pour Lâivresse de lâargent, je nâai regardĂ© que le dvd français (Wild Side). La qualitĂ© des masters est bonne dans tous les cas, avec une mention pour le blu-ray Wild Side. Le dvd britannique ne propose que des sous-titres en anglais, alors que les Ă©ditions françaises proposent Ă©videmment des VOSTF. Le blu-ray français de The Housemaid propose des supplĂ©ments en assez grand nombre (plus que dans le dvd britannique par exemple). MalgrĂ© des moments un peu convenus, ils sâavĂšrent plus intĂ©ressants que beaucoup, et câest Ă©galement le cas de celui de LâIvresse de lâargent : on y voit des acteurs souvent un peu perdus, ne comprenant pas bien leur personnage et dans quelle direction rame leur metteur en scĂšne â trop de perversion pour les uns, risque de mettre Ă mal leur image pour les autres, incomprĂ©hension des motivations des personnages pour Ă peu prĂšs tous : on voit bien que si la caricature est un art (certes maniĂ© plus ou moins bien, y compris en lâespĂšce), les acteurs ne voient pas bien Ă quoi elle rime. Bref, il ressort assez fortement que si tous se disaient que cela ferait bien dans leur CV dâavoir tournĂ© avec Im Sang-soo, Ă lâĂ©preuve du tournage cela a Ă©tĂ© difficile pour plus dâun. Bref, dans les deux cas un making-of ne comportant pas que des propos lĂ©nifiants visant Ă expliquer que tout le monde sâest aimĂ© du premier au dernier jour du tournage : mĂȘme en modĂ©rant le propos comme certains le font Ă©videmment, il ressort que cela nâa pas Ă©tĂ© le cas, et que le metteur en scĂšne a bataillĂ© contre le cĂŽtĂ© relativement conventionnel de la plupart de ses acteurs, et de leur jeu.Il est Ă noter que LâIvresse de lâargent ne se trouve que difficilement en blu-ray. LâĂ©dition blu-ray allemande ne propose en outre pas dâautres sous-titres quâen allemand. LâĂ©dition dvd britannique, qui se trouve sous le titre The Taste of Money, ne propose quant Ă elle comme souvent que des sous-titres anglais.Par ailleurs, une trĂšs bonne nouvelle Ă©dition dvd + blu-ray dâUne Femme corĂ©enne a paru en 2022 chez The Jokers.
A**O
Unico nel suo genere da comprare
Una ragazza bella dolce ma povera Euny trova lavoro nella casa di una ricchissima famiglia perchĂ© la bella e giovane moglie ma incinta di due gemelli, in piĂč la primogenita della famiglia la trova molto simpatica, quindi sembrerebbe tutto bene un ottimo lavoro e ben voluta da tutti. Ma presto Euny non dovrĂ fare solo la governante ma accettare le richieste del marito della donna incinta, lei in un primo momento ne Ăš anche lusingata perchĂ© il marito della signora Ăš molto generoso, ma dopo che le richieste aumentano e Euny resta anche incinta a questo punto tutto cambia e diventa un gioco pericoloso e meschino e la famiglia ricca per risolvere quello che ormai Ăš diventato un problema diventa anche pronta a tutto.Bel film anche se drammatico ottima fotografia e la trama sono da vero capolavoro.Alessandro E.
J**Y
a bit diappointing
story line well told but definately not risque or even mildly titillating, all in all not worth the money or the time to watch! The ending was sort of out of character.
Trustpilot
1 day ago
2 months ago