George Washington's Secret Six: The Spy Ring That Saved America Audio CD – Audiobook, November 5, 2013

First of all, I have read several books since I read Brian Milreade’s book on the spy ring during the American Revolution and I didn’t take notes so now my comments are going to be too general. Part way through I would have given it three stars but by the time I had finished it, I decided it might be worth four stars. I did finally end up enjoying it though I had problems with the early chapters where I thought the author painted with too broad a brush and lacked scholarly support.One of my objections is that the author never referred to the king as George III. He referred to him most often as the king and sometimes King George. There is no excuse for not identifying him as King George III since the king with his administration is the main culprit in causing the unconstitutional usurpations following the French and Indian War that ended in 1763 that led to the American Revolutionary war.The author did not seem to understand or at least appreciate that the colonists did not object to constitutional monarchy but only to the violations of their Charter rights which guaranteed to them the eternal rights of Englishmen just as though they were back home in England. The colonists with every king’s blessing had an elected lower house with the power of the purse. King George III was the first to ignore the guarantees that protected their lower houses.Some of you may disagree when you read the book but I don’t think the author made it clear that Abraham Woodhull, one of the spies, did not reject the authority of King George III because the king had been “born into his position.” To say that without clarification implies that the colonists opposed monarchy on principle whether absolute monarchy or constitutional monarchy.That was not true during American colonial history. It was unlimited power that the colonists opposed.The American colonists were proud of English history and its development into a strong constitutional monarchy with an elected Parliament the supreme of the law with the king under the constitution as well. Limiting the power of the king at crucial junctures of English history is England’s constitutional history and the colonists were proud of it and claimed it as their own since their Charters guaranteed those rights to them forever. They intended to maintain those rights long practiced.The title of the book is an overstatement since I don’t think there is any basis for anyone to maintain that the spy ring “saved” the American Revolution as important as its work was. On a far less important note when discussing the fifty pounds of lead that George Washington appreciated, the lead was referred to as “mettle”. It is a very old variant of the spelling which I have never seen used in a history book on history before. It is my understanding that by 1700 the distinction between “mettle” and “metal” had been fixed so by the time of the American Revolution the spelling would have been “metal”.One other quibble that some of you might appreciate is that the book calls Trenton and Princeton (Christmas 1776 and January 1777) the turning point of the revolution where-as every military historian I have read regards the battle of Saratoga in upper state New York in the fall of 1777, where General Benedict Arnold was able to save the day when the cowardly commanding officer Horatio Gates wanted to retreat, as the turning point of the war. The British General Burgoyne surrendered his entire army which was the first such occasion. The spy ring was not even organized until 1778 so I don’t see how it could be said to have “saved” the revolution.He also distracted me by going back and forth after the Declaration of Independence in referring to colonies or states. Once independence was declared and the Articles of Confederation was ratified as the new constitution, they were all states. Another point that distracted me was in a later discussion the author seemed to be saying that the “implied powers” in the Federal Constitution written after the war in 1787 was used to enlarge executive powers but the last paragraph of Section 8 in Article I shows that the implied powers was delegated to the legislative branch. The problem has been one of the power being misused by the legislative branch, not the executive.After having said all that, once he got beyond these issues and into the spy ring, the book got a lot better for me and I found each spy a fascinating study in his own right: Caleb Brewster, Robert Townshend, Abraham Woodhull, Benjamin Tallmadge ( a close friend of Nathan Hale’s) , Austin Roe, and Agent 355, an unidentified woman. It is really disappointing that no one after the fact, when it was safe to do so, ever divulged her identification and story. Someone among them had to have known it.It is annoying that even belatedly all the men finally received recognition for their vital contribution but not the only woman among them known as agent 355 who was a vital member of the ring. There were other women who helped do some spying but this book focuses on the secret six called the Culper Ring so named by Washington by abridging Culpeper County in Virginia.There seems to be an implication in the information provided about the super careful spy Robert Townshend, who did not want anyone to know his name and was given to much anxiety and trauma over the work he was doing, that he was very disturbed by the fact that Agent 355 was arrested and put in prison but apparently not executed as male spies were. This hints that he might have cared for this woman personally and if so, it seems inexplicable why we don’t know her name though we know Robert Townshend’s name. It is a bitter irony in a sense that this woman was never given any honor.On another issue Benedict Arnold was able to escape while Andre was executed which has always bothered me. Why the British would not give up Arnold to save Andre’s life is never discussed or explained. It is mentioned that George Washington was willing to exchange Andre only for Arnold but the British refused. Why they cared about a turn coat traitor willing to betray his side for money in exchange for a young, courageous man who had served the Crown faithfully with nobility and bravery is inexplicable to me and it frustrates me that the point is not even acknowledged.This story does mention that George Washington may have learned a difficult lesson from Nathan Hale who should never have been sent behind enemy lines without some training and some instructions from those experienced in spying. What Nathan Hale did makes you shake your head with deep regret for the waste of his life, a bright, educated and talented young man so naïve that in the midst of Loyalist surroundings, he was able to be induced to confide in a man who talked like a patriot but in reality was a strong Loyalist in one of the local taverns while he had the incriminating evidence in his boot.The point that was made in this book about Nathan Hale is that George Washington was therefore taught the priority of absolute secrecy and not allowing the names of the spies to be known by virtually anyone and that more sophisticated methods had to be developed in the codes used and the invisible ink employed and the system for making contacts made as obscure as possible so as not to arouse suspicion. The spy ring itself guarded identities with a grim vigilance and Robert Townshend carried it to an ultimate extreme.The book has given me a curiosity to read further. I do recommend this book with all my misgivings, caveats and objections. If the first chapters don’t appeal to you either, skim over them or take notes so you can complain about them in your book review. The chapters that begin with the spy ring are worth reading.

"The British were being played, and from the least likely of corners. But they remained oblivious to the double-dealings in their midst. The parties went on. The coffeehouse debates continued as the officers went about surrounded by their circles of admirers. Major Andre's silly love poems were composed and published in Rivington's "Royal Gazette". The wine and words flowed freely as they bantered about their plans. The Army was in garrison -- comfortable, amused and completely oblivious to the fact that any shopkeeper, newspaperman, or charming lady in their midst was listening, remembering, and plotting,"- Brian KilmeadeThe place was New York City. The time was the Revolutionary War in America. The British Army under Sir William Howe had occupied this, the largest city in North America since September of 1776. General George Washington, commanding the rag-tag collection of professional soldiers, officers, and militiamen calling itself the American Army was camped outside of New York, smarting from the way in which he and his army were run out of that city, and looking for a way to get back in. The British had made their Headquarters there and in spite of Washington's fervent hopes of ejecting them, they would in fact remain there for the entire war. Washington absolutely had to find some way of penetrating inside New York and gathering intelligence on what the Brits were up to. And how he managed to do so is the subject of the truly fascinating book "George Washington's Secret Six - the Spy Ring That Saved the American Revolution." by Brian Kilmeade of Fox News and Don Yaeger.Through correspondence between Washington and the spies or between the spies themselves, and through careful examination of business records. Kilmeade and Yaeger have compiled a richly detailed, and compelling tale of courage and sacrifice in the heart of the enemy: in British-occupied New York City. They tell the story of six ordinary colonial citizens, known as the "Culpers": Abraham Woodhull, a gentleman bachelor farmer, and Robert Townsend, a gently-natured Quaker merchant and reporter for a British publication; the Royal Gazette. They tell of the owner of that publication, and of a popular coffeehouse, James Rivington who was viewed by his countrymen as an outspoken loyalist to the Brits. We learn about Austin Roe and his tavern, and Caleb Brewster, a tough longshoreman who ferried much of the information to the Americans. And most interestingly of all (to me, anyway) we learn of a woman who has never been identified, known only as agent "355" in the correspondence. This young lady of society was able to pick up important scraps of information by flattering self-important British officers who thought of themselves as impressive lady's men while unaware of just how useful they were being to this lady.Between them, they provided information that: foiled a British attempt to flood American markets with counterfeit currency, and stopped a British plan to ambush the troops of the French when they joined the American cause. In one remarkable instance they were able to acquire a copy of the British Naval Code Book, and present it to French Admiral D'Estaing in time to aid him in defeating the British fleet off of Yorktown Virginia. This wound up cutting off the escape of Cornwallis' Army for the decisive victory of the war. And perhaps most importantly, they provided the information which enabled their leader, American Major Benjamin Tallmadge (Codenamed "John Bolton") to break the plot by Benedict Arnold to hand over the American fortress at West Point to the British. And we see how most of these "moles' wished to stay unknown for their brave and heroic service to our country at the moment of her birth.All in all, Mssrs. Kilmeade and Yaeger have given us a fascinating look at a chapter of American Revolutionary history about which little has been written before this book's publication last Fall.* It reads like... well like a spy novel, which is afterall exactly what it is.. only it's true!! I can strongly recommend it for anybody who likes a good tale whether they prefer fiction or non-fiction. It is a top-notch read!!!

I've read numerous biographies and books about the American Revolution but knew only bits and pieces about Patriot spies. This book is very interesting and pays tribute to brave men and women who spied for Washington. Its great that we finally learn their names. I highly recommend this book.

Watched Turn with Jamie Bell and was intrigued by the Culper Ring. So bought this book next. I like the idea of using new ways to overcome seemingly insurmountable obstacles i.e. the British army/navy. The Ring was made up of ordinary but brave people. Such an interesting part of US history.

Excellent book on the little known Spy Ring Washington had set-up in NYC during the war to spy on the British.

A really enlightening book excellent

a good spy story all true back in the days that you don't associate with spying. thrilling..

Great, tense and romantic story of the spies who defeated the British army. From this book the series Turn was based and both are fabulously entertaining.