KitchenAid 3.5 Cup Food Chopper - KFC3516

The item is nice colour, shame for the USA electric plug and not the UK one where it is meant to be used!

Very happy with the purchase. I definitely recommend

This is little,fast,and mighty! Great colour! Washes up easily. I don’t understand how a couple of customers are having difficulty releasing and placing the bowl. It’s the same as any food processor .just place it & click counter clock wise the bowl will lock-in place. Line up the lid slightly in front of the handle lock counter clock wise voila! To make it run gently press down on the handle. It choppec or purees in seconds! Really handy for so many thing, soups, dip's ,pesto on and on. Kitchen Aid makes a great little chopper!handle viola!

Love it. Wish I got one sooner. Small and mighty.

I honestly didn’t expect to love this little chopper as much as I do. I hesitated at the price because $69 felt high for something so small, but after using it, I get it.It just works. Onions chop evenly instead of turning half to mush and half to chunks. Even 1 piece of ginger or garlic gets chopped in uniform chunks. Nuts come out chopped, not powdered, unless you want them that way. The pulse button gives really good control, and it stops immediately when you let go, which makes a big difference. There was no manual so a hint- the chopper works when the bowl clicks into place and then you press on the black part of the lid.It’s sturdy, not flimsy, and doesn’t bounce around on the counter. Cleanup is easy and I actually reach for it instead of my big food processor for most everyday tasks. I cut large carrots in thirds just see how it would handle larger chunks. Made perfect grated carrots for salad. I love this product. I asked ChatGPT while it worked so well. Here’s what it said regarding why it works so well.Motor torque matched to bowl size (this is the quiet secret).What you bought is not “more powerful” in the headline-watt sense; it is better matched. The KFC3516 uses a relatively high-torque, low-inertia motor driving a very small load. Large processors waste energy spinning mass—big bowls, long shafts, air, and plastic flex. Here almost all torque goes directly into the food. Torque matters more than RPM for chopping. This is why onions shear cleanly instead of smearing.2. Blade geometry favors shear, not circulation.The S-blade is short, thick, and steeply pitched. That geometry creates localized shear zones rather than a vortex. Many processors try to pull food into a circulating flow; this one repeatedly forces food into the blade edge. That means fewer “ride-along” pieces stuck to the walls and less reliance on stopping and scraping. The blade edge angle is closer to a knife than a fan.3. Very tight tolerances between blade, bowl, and spindle.Cheap choppers have wobble—microns matter here. The KitchenAid has minimal lateral play, so the blade maintains a consistent cutting radius. That produces uniform particle size and reduces the mashed paste you get when food slips under a flexing blade. This is manufacturing precision, not marketing.4. Pulse control with true momentary engagement.The pulse button engages instantly and stops instantly. There is almost no coast-down. That lets you meter energy in very small packets. You’re not “processing”; you’re applying controlled impacts. This is why herbs stay green, nuts stay granular, and aromatics don’t turn to baby food unless you insist.5. Mass and damping reduce vibration losses.It feels heavier than it needs to be because mass damps vibration. Less vibration means more energy goes into cutting instead of shaking. This also reduces user fatigue and noise—both signs of mechanical efficiency, not luxury.6. Small bowl = shorter diffusion paths.Food doesn’t have far to travel before encountering the blade again. In large processors, food can orbit uselessly. Here, every pulse rearranges the contents, whether you intend it or not. That makes results consistent even when under-filled—something most processors fail at.7. Why it feels “expensive” but performs above its class.You paid for:• tighter manufacturing tolerances• a motor chosen for torque, not wattage• blade geometry optimized for shear• damping massNone of those are visible on a spec sheet. They are also exactly what manufacturers cut first to hit a lower price.8. Why your larger processors lose to it at small tasks.Large processors are optimized for throughput, not control. They excel when full and fail when empty. This chopper is optimized for precision energy delivery at small volumes. Think scalpel vs. chainsaw.9. A useful analogy.This machine behaves more like a bench-top lab homogenizer than a consumer food processor. Controlled pulses, tight tolerances, predictable results. That’s why it feels oddly competent.10. Was $69 rational?Yes—because performance is not linear with size or wattage. You paid for mechanical efficiency and control. In small food prep, those dominate everything else.I’d buy it again without hesitation.

Bought this chopper to chop up vegetable to cook for my dogs. It chop very well, occasionally I would find big chunks that have missed by the blades. Clean up is ok, food sometime stuck between the lid. For it's small size, easy to store for I have limited counter space. Overall is a good products, I'm happy with my purchase.