Sigma60-600mm F4.5-6.3 DG OS HSM | S Canon Fit, 730954

El mejor lente todo terreno

It's an expensive piece of lens, but if you have craved for decent wide and super telephoto, this is the one. It's a beast in terms of quality, functions, features, and weight. Be ready to buy a heavy tripod (if you don't have one already). Zoom rings are a bit tight, but understandable why so because of the front element weight. But pull/push action comes in handy for the telescopic action. This new model's Arca-Swiss plate is very handy and eliminates the need for a shoe. Also, the color is now longer and helps to have all four finger grip underneath it. Earlier 150 to 600 was small and I could barely fit 3 fingers to grip. If you have the budget, go for it. You will not regret it. Moon shot is crisp (depends on the camera you attach to), and portraits are excellent!

This lens is one of the best lenses I have come across. It is built for sports and fast moving wildlife. It covers a formidable focal length of 10 X, from 60 mm to an impressive 600 mm. It's robust, with its aluminium/ magnesium shell coated in a protected neoprene/ rubberised coat, this lens is quick, responsive and is built to last. The only thing that goes against this lens is the actual weight, it is a damn heavy lens. If you want to forgo some of the focal length and go for a lighter lens I would advise Sigmas Contemporary 150-600mm lens. This lens retails at half the price of the sports, but you do sacrifice some of the build features and focal range, but equally a good lens. This Sports lens needs a monopod or tripod at least, as you do get fatigued carrying this lens about. I'm impressed with both the contemporary and the sports lens and I believe Sigma as while as a reputable lens manufacturer. I am impressed with this piece of kit and if you can stretch to the four figure price tag then go for it .....of course my second choice is the contemporary lens.

It’s a solid lens, very rugged and sturdy. It’s not light for carrying long distances and will need a gimbal head to attach to monopod or tripod. Images are very crisp. This is my first non-OEM(Canon) lens and I am pleasantly surprised by its quality. These photos have been taken in a nature preserve and zoo. Mostly one lens is enough for trips because of the range 60-600. Don’t buy this impulsively, try it first if possible!!

Both sample shots were taken at 600mm (no action shots due to privacy concerns; however, they were very sharp as well). The lens produces a nice bokeh (quality of out-of-focus blur)I used this lens (the Canon version, model ...54; the Nikon version is ...55) with a Metabones adapter connected to a Sony A7RIII. The AF worked intermittently--which is not the fault of either the lens or the camera; no one promised that this kludge would work--so my focus is primarily on the image quality.When the AF worked, it worked fast and accurately (AF would stop working, which required turning the camera off then on to regain AF). I had very few misses, and most of the shots were sharp. I tested its IQ against my Nikon 200-500mm--I have a very sharp version of that lens. I believe the AF is faster than the Nikon but did not directly compare the two. I shot a "Zombie Run", mostly action shots, and took over 2000 pictures. Images were sharp and well saturated (I really like the colors) at every focal length. At 600mm, there was noticeably more detail with the Sigma. I could not say the same when I tested the Sigma 150-600mm Sport against the Nikon. At normal size, you probably wouldn't notice the difference, but the additional magnification would be invaluable if you need to crop substantially.The downside is that the Sigma is bigger and heavier than the Nikon, which is a big and heavy lens in its own right. The Sigma is fatiguing if you need to hold it in shooting position for long (many will prefer to use the lens with a tripod/monopod). However, it is smaller than the Sigma 150-600mm Sport and balances better.Overall, this lens is a tremendous accomplishment by Sigma. If Sigma doesn't produce a version in Sony E-mount, I am considering buying it in Nikon mount and getting rid of my Nikon 200-500mm. The new Sigma is just that good.In sum, I do not recommend using the new Sigma "Bigma" with an adapter for Sony E-mount. However, for Canon and Nikon, the Bigma is undoubtedly the best consumer-grade long zoom produced to date.