Match Men's Slim Tapered Casual Pants #8105

I got these for my 18-yo son for a job interview. He is “too cool” for most pants but actually likes these. They are a nice rich dark black color, slim fit but not tight, and they have more than a bit of stretch. He loves them.

These pants are highly comfortable and REALLY enjoyable to wear when I dress casually/formally and pairing with one of my sport coats or blazers. They are stretchy so you still have plenty of mobility. It's like wearing comfortable slim jeans disguised as casual pants (lol).FASHION ADVICE: I saw some other reviews of guys talking about "too long for 6ft and 31in inseam" but looking at the pictures that they've posted, the pants aren't even sitting at their waist (your waist is just under/at your belly button) They're wearing them like hip pants (many guys think the waist is the hip but it's not) but they are waist pants. The categories are (low hip/hip/Waist/High Waist). Trust me fellas, wearing your pants at your WAIST is very groomed. I know y'all are imagining a nerdy cartoon caricature that has on "high water(high waist)" pants but that's not what waist pants are. They give you an even distribution of the upper body and extends your legs in appearance. For my fellas with a gut, it disguises your belly, giving you a slimmer look than when you wear it at the hip and your fat is hanging off the waistline, giving you a sloppier look.

I bought a pair of these 5 years back for business casual (green at the top) and they're surprisingly tough (no wear marks and no holes). It started losing its vibrant color after a year or two, but still looks good enough to wear.There are actually two types of these pants - one with 2 crotch buttons and one with one. The 2 button was the original, but they sent me 2 ones and one two, so I suppose the old version is still going on. The two button is a bit more soft, whole the new ones seem to be more tough (but still look very professional).My only gripe is that it's hard to tell the colors off of the site so, dark blue, dark red and army grey is what you see here.I got these 3 today and they fit so well & look so good new that I bought 3 more. Bad marketing, but great pants.*UpdateI got 2 more pair. The blue is extremely shiny, looks quite different from the rest, which is a bad look. Will be sending the blue back. Black is great.

As part of my endeavor to find a good business casual outfit it was imperative I find good pants. To me a chino is the perfect middle between too casual jeans and too formal dress slacks. Of course finding one that is not only comfortable but affordable and good looking is none too easy.Of course there are many sites where you can buy custom tailored pants but those go for $75+ and I just didn't need to spend that much. There's the saying "you get what you pay for" usually with reference to cheaper items being of lesser quality but for $20 these are hands down the best pair of chinos I've owned.They are very good quality and feel great. It does stretch well but at the same time doesn't make it look like you're wearing pajamas (which stretch material often does in my opinion.) I love the slim look in that it doesn't engulf my shoes and make me look like I've been working in a 90's office. The flat front is also very stylish.I'm heavyset but again these fit me very well. These don't restrict movement nor give off a "skinny pants" look. To wrap up these pants are: 1. Very comfortable. 2. Quite stylish with the tapered leg and flat front. 3. Amazing price. 4. Great color selection. Would definitely recommend.

Good Quality, size M fits perfectly, I fully recommend this brand

I've been looking for some relatively inexpensive (up to $50) casual pants with stretch and trying on several brands/styles, but I've been unimpressed by most (love Amazon's return policy). I thought I'd try to give some comparison of the things I've tried. We all have different bodies and prefer different styles. To give my opinions context, I'm 5'10", an athletic 165, and wear a 32/33x32 in most brands. Relative to most guys my size, I have bigger glutes and thighs from squats. I prefer a regular or slightly slim fit with a taper--to get both thigh space and the contemporary fit, I wanted high stretch and lightweight, and I am more comfy in low rise (rise is how low/high they sit on your waist, and the high rise admittedly rub my stomach area...ahh aging). For jeans, I now only wear Guess stretch or freeform in slim taper or slim straight with a low 10.5 rise (worth the high price) or Lucky Brand 121's with stretch in 32x30. I omitted capri pants and joggers as just not my style and looked for, but couldn't find, cargos.With that context, I tried:Match Men's Slim Tapered Casual, 32. Decent if you are lean. Quite inexpensive and lightweight, but not obviously "cheap." Despite the slight stretch, my rear is poppin'-- I'd recommend ordering slightly up, but I think a 34 won't work for me and wish Match made odd sizes. Someone called these relaxed fit...they are only relaxed relative to a skinny pant (perhaps super thin legs, bad item?). Low rise part is part of the current style, and I wonder if guys are ordering too big to try to pull these pants up above the hip. If you have a thinner rear, you should be fine (I mentioned ordering Asian brands to a Korean friend, and he made the point that Asian men are not typically known for derriers).Match Men's Slim Tapered Stretchy, 34 (the 8060 with higher spandex). Unimpressive style. They seem to be high rise with a taper that makes the calf tight (they are fairly thick so they don't stretch as much as a 4% spandex often does). The high rise seems contrary to a tapered pant, unless you are a woman going for that "mom jean" style. I tried dropping them to my hip, but when you do that you tend to have your thighs caught up in the crotch area. Returned them.Volcom Men's Frickin Modern Stretch Chino Pant, 32. Fit was fine--guided by the brand's website which you really should visit for measurements and see their other styles. A bit more formal cut compared to some as they are higher (a mid) rise and aren't tapered or very tight (they are skate pants?). Not a lot of stretch...and oddly, a bit scratchy. I kept them for work casual days.Volcom Men's Kinney Pant, 32. Not great. It's like the maker couldn't decide on a style. Like an IPA with no hops, or a stout with no malt. These are stretch? Overpriced for this quality--I can buy these for less at any big box. Seem to be high rise...but grabbed my fellas when pulled up and my thighs couldn't separate when I tried to wear them lower. Might explain the mention of a belt. If a belt is a must to keep your pants up, then just get a potato sack.Dickies Men's Regular Taper Stretch Twill 5-Pocket, 34 and 32. Awful. Bluntly, I assume these get by on their reputation among workers. I used to load UPS trucks, and we loved Dickies...but we were wearing thick canvas for function. These have almost zero stretch despite 2% spandex, shrank a lot, and are too thick for summer.RVCA Men's Stay Pant, 32 and 33-. I really wanted to like them as many like this brand... I love a comfy 5 pocket (jean cut) pant. But look at the picture...the pant sits above the hip. If you want that look, cool. They had a slight taper. But minimal stretch.RVCA Men's Daggers Twill Pant, 32. I was hopeful as they looked good. More low rise than the Stay Pant. But minimal stretch. I'd recommend trying them.Prana Bronson, 32 and 33. These are pricier and not tapered, and part of what inspired my search for cheaper, better-fitting stretchy pants. But I have to say that if you like a mid rise and don't want taper, then try these. Very stretchy (though the khali were better than black) and decent style for work.Phew.

service was good and i am happy

Hice devolución, el color y la prenda fue totalmente diferente a las fotos, además que el producto es de origen chino que incluso la talla viene más amplia

Great pants, fit perfectly