Saucony Men's Triumph 18 Road Running Shoe

These are my second pair of Triumph 18's, I a bought pair last year and find them very comfortable. They were very durable and I got over a 1,000 miles on the. I tried the Triumph 19, the newer shoes has the small lower as the 18 but the upper making it lighter and more breathable. This is better for running but I use for walking and hiking on developed trials and found the 18 much more comfortable. I tried Hoka Bondi 7 but found these a little firmer and not as bulky. I will look at getting another pair while there are still available. Great purchase for me.

If you are looking for sneaker comparable to the first generation ultraboost / Nike react, the Triumph might be the one for you.Pros: Amazing Cushion, bouncy and responsive, fits my flat feet with fallen arches, makes you a bit taller?, quality materials all overCons: Need better colorways, a bit unstable when walking, the mesh material is not as stretchy or comfortable as Flyknit or primeknit, shoe laces were a bit too long for me.

I used to be a runner and Saucony always fit me better and met my needs better than the other "Big Name" brands, and I tried them all! This shoe however (Triumph 18) takes it to a new level. I owned a pair of T 17's but they were too slipper like. These offer (for me) a perfect blend of support and comfort. I can no longer run but as a walking shoe they are perfect. Even for walking these shoes propel you forwards and the performance of the PWRRUN+ is remarkable. I've owned my first pair now for six months and they feel nearly the same as the new pair I just bought. Couldn't be happier!

Pros:More comfortable on strive and impact than most over rated brands.Shoe laces are light stretchy snuggy and grippy. Didn't have to tie double nut.True to size on my experience. I can't speak on anyone else.Looks really good on me.Padding, cushion and reflex are just right.Am not on running shape now but did run 5 miles yesterday after 2 hours upper body work-out at the gym and didn't struggle like I was hoping. BTW I ran 18 hours into my fasting.Cons:Price is a little steep for a year or 2 yrs old model.Reliability is always a question with this brand. I could say that bcoz I've been wearing them the last decade or so. Get this fix or else you'd get a star from me.

Might be the greatest running shoe of all time.For the past several years, these shoes have had a 220-250 lb. man pounding on them; you can't kill them. A true beast.The midsole is stable, exceptionally durable. The tongue stays put. The laces are nice and fat, don't have to use your fingers like tweezers (Asics comes to mind) to hold and tie the laces.

I used to run with Triumph a long time ago, the newer models used to have a support start near the little toe, and that was always an issues. But, this version fits more like a Brooks Glycrerin, but with a better heel. That is the part of the shoe I want to thank Saucony for, as this heel does not irritate my achilles. The fit is good, and comfort level is good too for a heavier runner (200 lb). I am not sure why so many companies design heel with counters that are stiff, and painful. It's not just the stiffness, it's the geometry of heel counter that bends back into the top of your heel. These shoes have a normal, not aggressive heel, and it fits.

As a shorter heavier runner I have tried like a dozen different shoes in the past few years and these have been perfect for me ! I wear them as loose as possible and they feel non existent on my feet with VERY thick cushioned insoles .. The whole shoe is extremely flexible and soft. For reference I am a heal stricker with a short stride as my heal lands just forward of my hips. I'm 5'8" and 250# half marathon time around 2:15 .. If you're built like me give these a try and I don't think you will be disappointed. Oh also I wear the wides ..

If you owned a pair of the Triumph 17, here is how they compare: They have less bulk and padding around the ankle collar---which is a good thing. These took me about ten miles of wear to fully break in. They do run smaller than the previous version of this shoe (I wear a wide width). Similar in length, but definitely a little more snug in width. Overall a very good running shoe after about 20 miles of wear. I have recently also worn shoes from Hoka and New Balance after years of wearing Brooks. This is my favorite shoe right now. I have three pair.